In A Course in Miracles, the concept of consciousness is approached in a very particular way, which may seem radical compared to other systems of thought. Consciousness, here, is not our ultimate state or our true nature, but a kind of mechanism that is part of the dream of separation. Other spiritual teachings, which could dilute the information of the course, tend to see consciousness as something eternal, divine, or as an ultimate reality. Here is how these differences manifest themselves:
"Consciousness is the first division introduced into the mind after separation, making the mind perceiving rather than creative. (T-3.IV.2:1)
1. Consciousness according to A Course in Miracles
In the Course, consciousness is not considered the highest reality. In fact, it is described as a product of separation, a manifestation of the divided mind. The Course makes a clear distinction between pure Spirit (our ultimate reality, which is united with God) and consciousness. Consciousness is simply the tool that allows us to perceive things in the dream world, and thus in illusion.
• Ego Consciousness and Holy Spirit Consciousness : Consciousness is often divided between two voices, that of the ego and that of the Holy Spirit. The ego uses consciousness to maintain the illusion of separation, while the Holy Spirit uses it to guide the mind to truth. In this view, consciousness is neutral in itself, but it can be used either to reinforce the illusion of this world or to remind us of our true identity as Spirit unified with God.
• Consciousness is not the ultimate truth : In the Course the ultimate truth is pure Spirit, one with God. Consciousness belongs to the world of time and perception, which is seen as an illusion. Thus, consciousness is not something to be sought or valued in itself, unlike many modern spiritual teachings that glorify it.
2. Understanding Consciousness in Modern Spiritual Teachings
Many current spiritual teachings dilute the message by placing consciousness at the center of spiritual awakening or equating it with ultimate reality. Here are some examples of this dilution:
• Consciousness as a Divine Reality : Many modern spiritual teachings, especially in the New Age, view consciousness as something divine and eternal. They teach that our goal is to raise our consciousness, to become more conscious, or to merge with the “universal consciousness.” These teachings tend to present consciousness as some kind of spiritual achievement, or even as our true nature. However, for the Course, consciousness is only a mechanism in the dream of separation, and not an ultimate reality.
• Raising Consciousness : Teachings that speak of raising one's consciousness, reaching higher states of consciousness or cosmic consciousness are at odds with the Course, as they suggest that consciousness is something to be transformed or perfected. According to the Course, these approaches further reinforce the idea of separation, as they imply that there is a "self" that must evolve in a linear process to reach a higher state of consciousness. Instead, the CEM teaches that true liberation comes not through raising consciousness, but through the dissolution of the ego and the recognition of the unified Spirit that transcends consciousness.
• Consciousness as a tool for creation : Some spiritual systems, especially those based on the “law of attraction” or manifestation, teach that consciousness has direct creative power and can “shape reality.” In these systems, it is often said that we must learn to control or master our consciousness in order to create the life we desire.
For the course this idea reinforces the illusion that we are creators in a world that is itself illusory.
The important thing is not to create in illusion, but to wake up from the dream of separation, in which consciousness plays a central role.
"Consciousness is the mechanism of reception, not of creation. It can confuse reception with creation and believe that what it imagines is real." (T-3.IV.2:4-5)
3. Misunderstandings about consciousness
Common misunderstandings in the various teachings often come from confusing consciousness with Spirit or divine nature . A Course in Miracles clearly distinguishes Spirit (which is perfect, eternal, and unified with God) from consciousness (which is part of the dream of separation). Here are some common misunderstandings:
• Consciousness as Observer : Some teachings encourage the idea that consciousness, as observer, is a kind of neutral, divine witness that can remain outside of worldly events. The Course teaches that this observing consciousness is still part of the dream, for it involves a duality (the observer and the observed). True spiritual realization transcends this division.
• Consciousness as a necessary step to awakening : Some teachings hold that consciousness is a bridge between the ego and enlightenment, and that by developing our consciousness we move closer to awakening. The Course, on the contrary, asserts that awakening is a process of unlearning , not of perfecting consciousness. Consciousness, like perception, must be surrendered in order to access the truth of Being, which does not need to perceive or divide itself into objects of consciousness.
4. Consciousness as a temporary tool according to the course
Although the Course considers consciousness to be part of the illusion, it also recognizes that it can be used temporarily to help awaken from the dream. The Holy Spirit, uses consciousness to correct misperceptions and guide the mind to truth. Thus, consciousness is a tool, but it is not the end in itself.
The Course teaches that when we allow the Holy Spirit to reinterpret our perceptions, we transform our use of consciousness. The consciousness that was used to maintain separation can then be used to bring the mind into oneness. But once the dream is over, consciousness itself will disappear, because there will be no more separation to perceive.
"The Holy Spirit sees everything as a means of bringing you home to the Father. Therefore, He teaches that the conscience has a temporary and necessary purpose: to bring the mind to correction." (T-5.III.11:1)
Comentarios