top of page

When Someone Attacks Your Innocence: A Perfect Mirror for Learning to Forgive

Nov 21, 2025
8 min read


I'm writing these lines from a strange in-between:

between sky and earth, settled in the plane taking me to Gary Renard's seminar.


And as the clouds unfold beneath me,

I think back on what has happened these past months.


This year, on two occasions, two people with absolutely no connection to each other said exactly the same sentence to me:


"Funny, that's strange…

what you're going through reminds me of the last two forgivenesses taught by Arten and Pursah:

the forgiveness of death… and the forgiveness of reputation."


Twice.

The same message.

The same angle.


And I have to admit:

looking honestly at my year, that is exactly what came to me, sometimes gently, sometimes brutally:


  • death, with everything it opened in my heart,

  • then reputation, with all the fear it awakened.



Two extreme forgivenesses.

Two areas where the ego still thinks it can hold on.

Two opportunities for liberation that moved through me without asking my opinion.


And as I settled into this seat, I felt it was no coincidence.

That something wanted to be said,

set down,

acknowledged,

forgiven.


So I write.

Because this path has transformed me more than I care to admit.

Because forgiveness is never theoretical.

Because it takes our life and turns it into its classroom.





1. An attack is never what it seems: recognizing the sensitive spot


When the situation erupted, what affected me was not the content itself:

it was the precision with which it touched a place still alive in me.


An old fear, discreet but persistent:


  • the fear of being misunderstood,

  • the fear of having false intentions attributed to me,

  • the fear of being seen as what I am not,

  • the fear of having my image tarnished.


It's subtle, but deep.

And as long as that fear is there, even as a trace, it can be triggered.


I understood immediately:

it wasn't the other person hurting me, it was an unforgiven belief in me asking to be seen.


The attack wasn't an attack.

It was a mirror.


A precise, intelligent, almost surgical mirror.

A mirror showing me the place that was still fragile.




2. Behind the form: seeing the suffering that overflows


Very quickly, I stopped looking at the form.

Words are never the heart of the situation.

What I saw first was his suffering.

A real, visceral suffering, impossible to contain any other way.


I saw:


  • an emotional overload,

  • recent traumas still raw,

  • old wounds piling up,

  • a sense of powerlessness,

  • fear,

  • and the urgent need to project what he could no longer handle alone.


That day, the outlet was me.

Not because I deserved it:

but because suffering always looks for a way out somewhere.


When I truly saw that,

something turned around.

There was no longer an enemy.


There was only an overwhelmed human being,

and a pain too heavy for him alone.




3. The mirror: what it was really awakening in me


But the key wasn't what he was living,

it was what I was living.


What the situation awakened in me was:


  • the fear of being seen badly,

  • the fear of having my innocence called into question,

  • a sensitivity to injustice,

  • a remnant of identification with a social image,

  • a subtle attachment to "how I am perceived".


And I saw it clearly:


we can only be touched where we still identify with the character.


This realization wasn't violent this time

It was liberating.


It wasn't:

"I am hurt."


It was:

"I see the place where I still believed I was defined by someone else's gaze."


The mirror worked perfectly.




4. Reputation: the ground where the ego tries to survive


The way he tried to protect himself offered me an even more precise mirror.


He wrote.

He explained.

He justified.

He wanted to convince.

He wanted to "correct" the interpretation.

He was trying to save his image.


At first, it hurt me.

Of course.


But very quickly, it became clear:

I knew that movement.

I had lived it before.


I too, in my life, have sometimes wanted to correct a misunderstanding.

I too have tried to save an image.

I too have been afraid of being misperceived.


So there was no more room for judgment.

Only for recognition.



It wasn't his behavior that changed.


It was

my perception

of his behavior.


And forgiveness began to settle in.




5. From defending… to setting down: the inner turnaround


I won't lie:

at first, I wanted to defend myself.

To write to everyone myself and tell my version.


The reflex to respond,

to explain,

to set the record straight,

is very human.


But in that inner turmoil,

another voice made itself heard, very gentle, very simple, very clear:


"You have nothing to defend.

Nothing real has been threatened.

Set it down.

Come back here.

Let peace do its work."


I heard that voice through those who accompany me; the people I train became my teachers in that moment…

Wait… don't react… give it to the Holy Spirit…

And the urgency to defend myself melted away.


Not because I "chose to be wise",

but because I saw that nothing was really asking me to react.


There was no more attack.

No more threat.

Just a projection looking for a way out.


And peace returned.

By itself.


It began to show up as a feeling of finally being able to breathe… It's funny, because I had a friend read the draft of this article before publishing it. I hadn't mentioned this feeling. But he felt it as he read.



6. What he too had to forgive: and the deep law of "choosing for two"


Looking more deeply, I understood that what was at stake wasn't only my process.

He too was living something very intense, very inward, very human.


What I saw in him (his fear, his confusion, his sometimes impulsive reactions, the need to flee or defend himself) wasn't an attack against me, but a sincere attempt to survive what was awakening in him.

An attempt to regain some semblance of control at a moment when everything was slipping away from him.


And that is when a great truth struck me:

he was doing exactly what we all do when our own wounds are triggered.


We look for:


  • tools,

  • protections,

  • explanations,

  • rituals,

  • energy readings,

  • certainties,

  • anything to calm the fear.


I have seen around me this instinctive reflex in some people, in shamanic or spiritual circles, when they feel threatened: doing rituals to "block", "purify", "protect", sometimes even seeking heavier practices because anxiety seems to take up all the space.


And I saw that I was no different.

I too have sometimes consulted mediums, not out of true guidance, but out of fear.

I too have looked for answers because I wanted to control the future.

I too have projected my worries, looked for signs, for reassurance.


What we call "intuition" is often just our anxiety in disguise.

And I really saw that.



But the most important point is this:


in every relationship, there is only one mind deciding.

And every instant is a "choice for two".


This means that:


  • if I choose peace, I offer it for two;

  • if I choose fear, I sustain it for two;

  • if I refuse to condemn, I withdraw condemnation on both sides;

  • if I forgive, I free two minds at once.


This isn't poetic:

it's literal.


There is no "my" mind and "his".

There is only one mind dreaming this scene.

And the moment I refuse to feed the conflict,

the moment I refuse to answer the attack,

the moment I see the innocence behind the form,

I make a choice for two.


I free perception on both sides of the mirror.


What he couldn't yet forgive in himself,

what the situation was awakening in him,

what he was trying to manage through projection,

it was as if Life were telling me:


"See beyond his reaction.

What he cannot forgive, forgive it for two.

What he cannot soothe, soothe it for two.

What he believes is an attack, look at it with love for two."


And in that instant, everything turned around.


There was no longer "him attacking me".

There was no longer "me having to defend myself".


There were only two parts of the same mind seeking a different relief…

and only one possible decision:

to choose peace for two.


That is the secret depth of forgiveness:

we never forgive for ourselves alone.

We forgive for the other.

We forgive through the other.

We forgive for two minds at once.


And this is how the relationship, even in the form of conflict, becomes a place of liberation.



7. The hidden gift: an unexpected liberation


What looked like a conflict was in fact a purification.


A silent dissolving.

A turnaround.

A lesson.


I understood that:


  • my innocence could not be touched,

  • my truth could not be tarnished,

  • my reputation said nothing about me,

  • and nothing real had been put in danger.



The painful part…

was only a remnant of belief.

Like a small shadow still clinging to my perception.


This event came to dispel that shadow.



8. Deep synchronicity: not outer, but inner


I want to come back to synchronicity.


What touched me in recent days

is not the "coincidence" of being on a plane to Gary's seminar.

It isn't an outer wink.


It's much subtler than that.


It's the deep feeling that:


  • this forgiveness was ripe now,

  • this understanding had to open now,

  • this cycle had to close now,

  • and life lined up events so that it became obvious.



Synchronicity, in this sense,

is not a "sign".

It is an inner adjustment.


A gentle realignment.

A natural movement.

A coherence revealing itself.


As if Life were whispering:


"You have arrived at the precise point where this forgiveness can be lived.

Nothing is early, nothing is late.

Everything is exactly in its place."




  1. Compassion, truth and compromising with the lie



These past months, I saw something very subtle in myself:

I believed it was love to accept the other's view, even when it came from fear.


I believed that respecting his path meant entering his perception, validating it, adopting it to reassure him.

And I confused compassion with compromise.


Yet the Course is very clear:

you can respect someone deeply without ever validating the fear they believe is real.


Because validating someone's fear is telling them inwardly:


"Your fear is right.

The danger is real.

You are vulnerable."


This is what the Course calls making error true, in other words confirming the lie.


And that is where I saw my own trap:

I didn't validate the other's fear out of love…

I validated it out of fear of being abandoned.


I confused:


  • love with the idea of not contradicting,

  • compassion with complacency,

  • welcoming with agreeing,

  • and peace with the absence of confrontation.


Whereas true compassion is exactly the opposite.


True compassion says:


"I love you too much to believe in your fear with you.

I am with you, but I will not reinforce what makes you suffer.

I do not validate the lie, even if you believe it very strongly."


And that is what I should have done:

stay anchored in love,

rather than compromise with the truth to keep a bond,

rather than enter his belief to be accepted,

rather than sacrifice the light out of fear of being left aside.


Truth does not compromise: not out of harshness,

but because authentic love refuses to reinforce fear.


And today, I understand that the only thing worth defending…

is love itself.



9. And a word about the Course… and the uncompromising nature of truth (gentle, but radical)


I told you above that in recent months I saw a subtle mistake I was making:

I wanted to compromise.


To compromise between two visions that don't speak from the same level:


  • the shamanic red path: beautiful, sincere, but based on form, tools, fear of attack, protection,

  • and the Course: which teaches a level of consciousness where fear has never existed.


The red path says:


"There are outside forces.

Protect yourself.

Purify.

Fight."


The Course says:


"Nothing can truly reach you.

Fear has no ontological reality.

You are safe, even when you believe the opposite."


These are not two contradictory paths.

But they are not two paths that can be layered on top of each other.


You don't mix fear with the absence of fear.

You don't mix ritual with the total absence of ritual.

You don't mix struggle with peace.


The Course doesn't compromise.

But it never attacks.

It imposes nothing.

It accuses nothing.


It simply says:


"Come and see from another level.

I'm waiting for you.

I will walk at your pace.

You have nothing to fear.

Ever."


It is uncompromising in its message,

but infinitely gentle in the way it gives it to us.


The ego resists.

Always.

That is its nature.


But truth…

never resists.

It simply waits, patiently,

for us to let it in.

Today, I have accepted that my only function here is forgiveness. I can't wait to write to you after this weekend with Gary!


Comments


bottom of page